Monday, September 25, 2017

Storms and slowdown in wages = late Summer economic slowdown

While the overall fundamentals of the economy seem to be in a good place, with 4.4% unemployment, job growth continuing and the stock market near record highs, there have been some hints in September that maybe things aren't going to end up as swell economically as we thought a month ago.

Take a look at the Atlanta Federal Reserve, who has been consistently revising down their GDP growth estimates for the 3rd Quarter in recent weeks. The Atlanta Fed now says growth for this quarter will be 2.2% compared to the high 3’s a month ago.



Yes, some of that slowdown is likely due to Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, as both have caused notable spikes in unemployment claims for Texas and Florida in recent weeks (Florida’s total claims doubled last week, according to the most recent report from the Department of Labor). On a side note, it does not look like Puerto Rico or the US Virgin Islands are included in the US GDP numbers, so the devastation in those American territories won't be seen in our stats. So while the storms should dampen things in this quarter, it seems unlikely cause much damage much beyond that, based on the experience of other calamities in the last 12 years. However, that might also mean that September’s jobs and spending figures could trend down.
"If the past is any guide, Q3 real GDP could be marginally weaker than expected due to the offline effects of the storm and the fact that Houston accounts for 3.2 percent of U.S. GDP, in addition to being a key energy and shipping hub," Joe Quinlan, managing director and chief market strategist at U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management, wrote in a research note Thursday. "To this point, in the weeks following Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, unemployment claims spiked, industrial production dropped and higher gasoline prices dampened real personal consumption expenditures."

A common narrative in the immediate aftermath of Harvey's landfall was that the storm would wreak havoc on local communities but wouldn't materially hold down the broader U.S. economy. But as the days went on and the full extent of its damage was assessed, outlooks and predictions began to darken.

"The storm's effect on U.S. GDP is likely to be substantial, but substantial when it comes to large storms is measured in tenths of a percent rather than full percentage points," a team of researchers at UBS wrote in a research note last week. "The fall in U.S. GDP comes from an outright decline in employment as well as a curtailment of exports, especially exports of petroleum products."

In a more recent note published Thursday, UBS researchers warned that "Harvey's economic implications point to more downside risk to payrolls and near-term GDP growth than initially anticipated."
Here’s the worrysome part- we already were seeing some disappointing figures before the hurricanes hit. A couple of weeks ago, we had a subpar jobs report, with only 156,000 jobs added, previous months revised down by 41,000, and unemployment ticking up by 0.1%.

The jobs figure could be a late-summer blip, but other economic reports also gave some signs of softening. That same report said average hourly earnings were only up 0.1% in August and a lower work week made weekly wages drop by 0.2%. Then inflation figures came out last week and said that prices went up by 0.4%. That was the largest increase since January, largely due to sizable increases in the price of gasoline and shelter, and when combined with the wage numbers, it meant that real weekly wages fell by 0.6% in August. The rising inflation means that the increase in real wages is only 0.6% in the last 12 months, well below where we were last year. Stagnant wages could also be reflected in a surprisingly soft retail sales report that hit 10 days ago, where sales declined by 0.3% for August, with notable drops in auto sales, and the largest increase being in gas stations, reflecting higher prices over actually added activity.

Combine that with some suppression of economic activity this month due to the hurricanes, and gas price spikes in other parts of the country driving up inflation, and you can see where we might be back in a softer-than-expected patch for the economy. And even with the hurricanes heading out to sea, oil on the US market continues to go up. It rose $1.40 a barrel today, has risen 11.8% in September alone, and Brent Crude is at its highest level in more than 2 years. That's going to show up at the gas pumps in the near future, meaning that higher prices may be the rule and not the exception for the last 3 months of the year.

Now maybe rebuilding and more normal weather will cause a slight bump up at the end of the year, and maybe there will be some kind of wealth effect due to this still-bubbly stock market. The US economy has proven very resilient for the 8+ years of this recovery, and I can't see things slipping into recession any time soon. But the recent economic reports and events of recent weeks makes me think that the only place that we’re seeing a “Trump Boom” is on Wall Street, and not anywhere close to the real world.

Of course, I'm assuming the GOP WON'T screw up health care this week. If that happens, then all bets are off, given the chaos will result in the insurance market over the next few months.

More mergers, fewer startups. Not a good combo in US or WIsconsin

Yesterday, John Oliver’s in-depth segment “Last Week Tonight” dealt with something that we hear about in many fashions these days- corporate mergers. Oliver’s segment pointed out that from airlines, to beermaking, to casket makers(!), a diminishing number of large firms are cornering our markets. And that results in higher fees when you fly, less choices for consumers, and more money flowing to Wall Street instead of Main Street (as usual with Oliver's show, language may be NSFW).


You may well be angry with the service you get from airlines, but thanks to consolidation, they don't really need to give a shit about what you think." - John Oliver

Wisconsin is not immune from this 2010s trend. For example, in the next 2 weeks we will see how many PDQ stores end up closing and/or removing employees out of “efficiency” as their stores turn in to Kwik Trips. In addition, several Gordy’s Food Stores in the state have either folded and/or been converted to Festival Foods in recent months, and you can probably think of other industries in your town that have a smaller variety of outlets than it did in the past.

In a similar vein, UW-Madison grad student Ken Smith attended the panels on the Wisconsin’s economy at the first annual Ideas Fest on the UW campus, and filed this report in Urban Milwaukee regarding what executives and politicians were saying were the keys to get the state’s stagnant economy moving ahead. A common trend that came up in the sessions Smith attended involved the state’s horrible record at having new businesses start up, along with the state’s inability to attract and keep talent.
A majority of speakers in both panels spoke favorably regarding education and improving statewide entrepreneurialism through policy and investment endeavors. All panelists generally agreed the future of Wisconsin’s economy requires workers to have at least a two-year degree from a technical college or a four-year bachelor’s degree. “Wisconsin needs an educated workforce and research infrastructure, whether making things or selling ideas. It’s not just about education, classrooms, and students. It’s also about research,” [UW Chancellor Rebecca] Blank emphasized. In the subsequent panel, Kathleen Gallagher of the local tech-oriented nonprofit Milwaukee Institute, echoed a similar sentiment. “UW-Madison is ranked 11th nationally in computer science, we need to keep it there or bolster it,” she said.…

“I can’t find enough people in Eau Claire,” said [JAMF Software Founder Zach] Halmstad. JAMF, a developer of Apple software products, began in Eau Claire and while maintaining its Eau Claire operation, has moved its headquarters to Minneapolis. It is multinational and has additional offices in Cupertino, California; Amsterdam, Hong Kong, Sydney, and Katowice, Poland.

To bolster Wisconsin’s strengths, Joy Tang, urged Wisconsin companies enhance tech-based research and development. “Every big industry can create its own innovation center, there needs to be more innovation labs around big entities,” she stressed. Tang is the co-founder and CEO of the fashion app Markable, which began in Madison but now has a larger presence in New York City.

Kevin Conroy, Chairman and CEO of Madison-based Exact Sciences a developer and manufacturer of colon cancer screening tests, was critical of Wisconsin’s political climate. Conroy accused the state’s leadership of ‘starving’ state entrepreneurs of access to investment dollars. “Developing an economy isn’t really that complicated, but it’s hard. If you want job growth, all job growth comes from entrepreneurship, from young companies,” rather than giving tax breaks to legacy companies.

Conroy argued the state was investing in the wrong things and was critical of the state’s deal with Taiwanese electronics manufacturer Foxconn. “The notion of spending $3 billion on Foxconn is maddening. It’s as if Barnum and Bailey took over the capitol. There really isn’t money for the entrepreneurs, and we really have to change that.”
Conroy nails the problem at the end of that passage. Our GOP-run state government has devalued education and entrepreneurship in favor of taxpayer-funded kickbacks to established corporations who have donated to them. It’s a strategy that might grab a headline or two to fool a few rubes and help the war chest for election season, but it does nothing to help the overall state economy (and likely limits it long-term due to the lack of start-ups).

You can see where a situation when having a few individuals have outsized influence on an economy and its politics are leading to really bad things for 99% of the rest of us, whether that’s in higher prices for products, a limited range of options for consumers, a degraded environment, and slower growth that doesn’t reach the vast majority of us. And unless we change leadership to include a group of people that care more about the big picture over big money and consolidating power, it won’t get better for almost all of us.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

On kneeling, Packers rise in the face of Trump, others going low

I understand that Donald Trump's complaints about (mostly black) NFL players kneeling during the national anthem to protest injustice is likely a misdirection play. I mean, if your last, best chance to destroy health care is going down the tubes and the Russia investigation is getting closer to your doorstep, you might try to change the subject too. But I was a sports fan well before I was into economics or politics, and I feel the intersection of these two topics is something I have to talk about.

First of all, who is Five-Deferment Donny to speak about what is proper respect for the flag or the anthem? I mean, look at this shit from April.



Or this, from the GOP primaries.



In fairness, it could just be senility with Trump, but the bottom line is this guy has NO authority to decide what is proper conduct. And neither do the (overwhelmingly white) armchair warriors who try to claim that the anthem or the US flag is "respect for the troops" 1. If you gave a fuck about the troops you wouldn't elect morons like Trump who would throw us into a random war to make up for his...uhhh... inadequacies. 2. You don't give a damn about "freedom" or "diversity" in what you constantly claim is The Best Country in America.

Your talk of freedom is THE FREEDOM TO IMPOSE YOUR VALUES ONTO OTHERS. You love America if YOU get to set the agenda and morality. But everyone else in this great nation can go to hell, can't they? This comment from one-term fluke Congressman Joe Walsh sums up this white privilege mentality.



SO much wrong in this statement.

1. You DO care what color the person is. These people have been taking knees because they are not being treated equal due to the color of their skin. Which means America IS racist. And you don't want to think about that unpleasant truth because you don't have to deal with those bad things, and it reminds you of your white privilege.

2. Why are athletes of color supposed to be considered "ungrateful? Making money doesn't mean you are immunized from being given second-class treatment, and it doesn't mean you shouldn't accept second-class treatment. Go ask Seahawks Defensive End Michael Bennett if you don't understand that.

There is also a common theme of those who complain about Trump's disrespect to "shut up and play football." Which to me is completely backwards, and conjures up images in my mind of this sign from the past.



Far too many meatball fans want players to do nothing more than entertain them, and entertain them on their own (mediocre white guy) terms. But when the game ends on Sunday and/or their careers end later on, they couldn't give a flying fuck about those people. It's very much in the "Dance fool, Dance!" type of vein, and maybe athletes playing a violent game at the highest level deserve more than that.

Locally, the Packers have stepped up to the plate, and continued the Lombardian tradition of standing up against inequality and having the backs of their players and other team employees.



Now that's another reason why the Packers are the REAL America's Team. And if any of you small-minded, symbol-addicted posers want to turn in your tickets because that hurts your snowflake feelings- there's tens of thousands of us that will replace you in a heartbeat. And unlike you, we'll respect the players that represent the Green and Gold on the field.

While I'm cool with guys taking a knee or sitting on the bench during the anthem on their own, it looks like a common theme of what might be done today on NFL sidelines is a locking of arms or taking a knee in team unity. I think that may be the best message of all in light of our "divide and conquer" president trying to pass over injustices being inflicted far too many of our fellow Americans.



We can have athletes say things on their own and it serves a purpose in breaking people out of their comfortable cocoons and make some aware that far too many Americans are given second-class treatment. But having all 53 players and the coaches saying "WE ARE ALL BROTHERS AND WE ARE ALL TOGETHER IN THIS, AND NONE OF US WILL BE TREATED UNEQUALLY" seems more powerful.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

Russians did try to hack Wisconsin elections. Why don't WisGOPs care?

Late Friday afternoon, this item of information got dumped into public by the Wisconsin Elections Commission, making Wisconsin one of 21 states to be notified.
This afternoon, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security notified the Wisconsin Elections Commission for the first time that “Russian government cyber actors” unsuccessfully targeted the state’s voter registration system in 2016.

WEC Administrator Michael Haas has informed WEC Chair Mark Thomsen, who directed Commission staff to investigate why election officials were not notified earlier and report to the Commission at its meeting Tuesday.

“This scanning had no impact on Wisconsin’s systems or the election,” Haas said. “Internet security provided by the state successfully protected our systems. Homeland Security specifically confirmed there was no breach or compromise of our data.”
Yeah, but guess who did know? The Chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, who just happens to be Wisconsin's own Ron Johnson.

Let's go back to Bruce Murphy's excellent summary from January where he pieces together reports (since corroborated in the course of the Trump-Russia affair) that put Johnson not only in the center of the room where these hacking maneuvers are revealed.
As chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Johnson was one the so-called “Gang of 12,” the top 12 congressional leaders, who were invited to the meeting. (House Speaker Paul Ryan also attended the meeting.) Johnson later confirmed to Politico that he participated in the briefing.

“In a secure room in the Capitol used for briefings involving classified information, administration officials broadly laid out the evidence U.S. spy agencies had collected, showing Russia’s role in cyber-intrusions in at least two states and in hacking the emails of the Democratic organizations and individuals,” the Post reported.
And now we know Wisconsin ended up being a state where Russians tried to get voter registration data from. That may not have been part of this report, but I bet Johnson knew about it either before the election, or soon after, and he hasn't said shit about it. Even worse, Murphy documents how Johnson went along with Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell's plan to keep then-President Obama from letting the public know about Russia's attempts to interfere in our elections. Johnson then lied to the public about what he knew, to make it sound like the Obama Administration were the ones hiding information.
Johnson, in short, had an opportunity to be a patriot and condemn the fact that Russia was now engaged in such activities in the United States. But he issued no resolutions — in fact, not one word — on Russian’s cyber attacks on America.

Worse, he has engaged in his own pattern of misinformation on the subject. After the CIA publicly released a report in January concluding that Russia meddled in the presidential election to help Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump win the election, Johnson issued a statement to the Wisconsin State Journal saying he would “would need more definitive information before drawing further conclusions.” Johnson did not reveal that he had been informed back in September this was happening.

Johnson went on to complain to CNBC that the CIA refused to brief him on Russian hacking, saying “I have not seen the evidence that it actually was Russia,” while failing to note the CIA report’s echoed the briefing he’d received from other intelligence leaders in September.
The obvious question is "Why did Johnson not tell Wisconsinites about what he knew, especially if it might jeopardize their ability to vote? The obvious answer: BECAUSE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE WAS HELPING HIM AND TRUMP WIN IN WISCONSIN.



And Johnson isn't the only Wisconsin Republican mixed up in this thing. We know House Speaker Paul Ryan was also in the room before the November election, and Ryan's SuperPAC used information obtained by Russian hackers in attack ads against Dems. Again, this doesn't mean there was collusion with the Russians, but Lyin' Ryan was glad to take the help that their hacking produced.

Let's also not forget this little tidbit from earlier in the 2016 campaign, as was revealed in this column by International Business professor Ruth May in the Dallas Morning News as well as other sources during this year.
Donald Trump and the political action committees for Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich and John McCain accepted $7.35 million in contributions from a Ukrainian-born oligarch who is the business partner of two of Russian president Vladimir Putin's favorite oligarchs and a Russian government bank.

During the 2015-2016 election season, Ukrainian-born billionaire Leonard "Len" Blavatnik contributed $6.35 million to leading Republican candidates and incumbent senators. Mitch McConnell was the top recipient of Blavatnik's donations, collecting $2.5 million for his GOP Senate Leadership Fund under the names of two of Blavatnik's holding companies, Access Industries and AI Altep Holdings, according to Federal Election Commission documents and OpenSecrets.org.

Marco Rubio's Conservative Solutions PAC and his Florida First Project received $1.5 million through Blavatnik's two holding companies. Other high dollar recipients of funding from Blavatnik were PACS representing Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker at $1.1 million, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham at $800,000, Ohio Governor John Kasich at $250,000 and Arizona Senator John McCain at $200,000.

In January, Quartz reported that Blavatnik donated another $1 million to Trump's Inaugural Committee. Ironically, the shared address of Blavatnik's companies is directly across the street from Trump Tower on 5th Avenue in New York.
I've never heard Walker be asked about this interesting donation, and I also find it intriguing that when the story of Russians trying to hack Wisconsin election information hit the local newspapers yesterday, Walker's campaign wouldn't talk about the hacking attempt itself.
Tom Evenson, a spokesman for Gov. Scott Walker, said the announcement "confirms what we already knew, which is Wisconsin held an honest and fair election with no interference."
Tommy sure seems quick to want to say "Nothing to see here", doesn't he? In fact, yesterday's news confirms that there were attempts NOT to make the 2016 election "honest and fair" in Wisconsin, and there's absolutely NO confirmation that this was the only attempt to mess with Wisconsin's elections.

Then again, there's probably a reason that Walker's flunky doesn't want to discuss the need to protect against past and future attacks on our election system, which comes up after an ill-timed veto from his boss.
Friday's disclosure came a day after the GOP governor cut six jobs from the Wisconsin Elections Commission as part of the state budget. Evenson said the jobs were vacant and had nothing to do with cybersecurity.
And when Walker vetoed those extra positions on Thursday, he claimed that temporary staff could fill the extra needs for the state's elections as November 2018 comes closer. Yeah, because the average short-timer off the street is a match for international espionage.

But this goes back to what I mentioned earlier. The Wisconsin GOP had no problem with Russian interference in 2016, because it helped their side. And as I've mentioned before, lower turnout in the Dem-voting cities last November were a big key behind the close, surprising wins for Trump and Johnson.



To conclude, I'm not saying the Wisconsin GOP colluded with the Russians, but they were more than happy to reap the benefits of what the Russians did in 2016. And the fact that they don't seem too concerned over the alarming revelations that have come public in 2017 is a big red flag that demands more investigation by both legislators and media in DC as well as here in Dairyland.

Maybe it's all coincidence. But boy, that's a lot of coincidences that just happened to benefit one side.

Friday, September 22, 2017

Low income growth and increasing inequality. Welcome to today's Wisconsin!

Last week, the Census Bureau gave their annual release on health insurance, poverty, and income in America, as well as the comparisons across states for each of these stats. I mentioned Wisconsin’s standing on health insurance in this post, where I noted other Midwestern states have made better progress than we have in the Age of the ACA.

But I wanted to point out the income side of the equation here. Nationwide, real median household income went up by 2.4% in 2016, and was at $57,617 for the year. Wisconsin's median household income was slightl below that at $56,811. This places Wisconsin behind Minnesota and Illinois, in line with Iowa, and a few thousand above Indiana, Michigan and Ohio.



But if you dig deeper into the Census Bureau’s summary of income-related items in the American Community Survey (ACS), you’ll see that Wisconsin lagged well behind the rest of the country when it came to growing that income in 2016. For example, while Wisconsin joined most of America in having income growth above the rate of inflation in 2016, Wisconsin’s increase was only good for 39th out of the 50 states, and was dead last in the Midwest.

Real median household income 2015 vs 2016
Ind. +2.8%
Minn +2.2%
Iowa +1.9%
Mich +1.8%
Ill. +1.44%
Ohio +1.40%
Wis. +1.2%

After the Census Bureau information came out, Governing Magazine created a good interactive display for all of the states and their changes in income over the last year. They also take a look at how inequality has changed in the various states over the last decade. Measured by a stat called the Gini Index, this figure has increased by 3.9% nationwide since 2006. But in Wisconsin, the changes in inequality have become even more pronounced.

Biggest Gini inequality changes, 2006-2016
Montana +9.6%
Rhode Island +8.1%
Vermont +8.1%
Idaho +6.9%
Wis. 6.1%

This looks even worse when you realize Wisconsin’s population is at least twice the size of any of those other 4 states, which lessens the effects of boom towns or plant shutdowns or other outliers.

And this trend of increased inequality picked up even more in Wisconsin last year, leading to this dubious distinction that was part of the Census Bureau’s writeup.
The Gini index for the 2016 ACS increased in Louisiana, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Massachusetts, Alaska, and Puerto Rico showed a decrease in the Gini index. The remaining 45 states and the District of Columbia showed no statistically significant changes between the 2015 ACS and the 2016 ACS.
That’s a STATISTICAL increase outside of the margin of error, and I don’t know about you, but I don’t want Wisconsin to be economically mentioned with West Virginia and Louisiana in anything.

So how are we dealing with this situation in the latest Wisconsin budget? By giving more to the rich and corporate while everyday people make less and pay more! This includes the rempeal of the state’s Alternative Minimum Tax (overwhelmingly paid by those making over $200K), a $74 million cut in property taxes paid by businesses (paid for by your tax dollars), the continued devaluing of the Homestead Credit for low-income Wisconsinites, and the removal of prevailing wage requirements on construction projects.

These things aren’t disconnected from each other, and they aren’t happening in a vacuum, people. And it won’t stop until you remove the politicians that made this increasingly unequal and stagnant Wisconsin economy happen.

While Foxconn region gets help, rest of the state is losing out

Three stories fell in a row on The Wheeler Report’s website today (and if you don’t read The Wheeler Report, you should). And it spoke volumes to me about the way things are (and aren't) working in Wisconsin these days.

The first is from Southeast Wisconsin, where we’re already starting to see employees come to town due to the Fox-con, as well as start to see the extra costs that are going to be part of the Fox-con that go well beyond the billions in tax breaks.
Several dozen Foxconn employees have temporarily moved into the SC Johnson iMET Technology Center [at Gateway Technical College in Sturtevant] located less than a mile from where the Taiwanese company is expected to build a huge display screen manufacturing plant…..

The Foxconn employees are made up of project planners and logistics managers, said Deb Davidson, the school's vice president of workforce and economic development….

Davidson revealed the existence of the newcomers at a Gateway Board of Trustees meeting Thursday morning at the Horizon Center in Kenosha.

At the meeting, the trustees gave tentative approval to a 50 percent expansion of iMET in order to accommodate Foxconn's training needs.

Expanding the building to the west will cost $5 million and be paid for by the state. Remodeling parts of the building and expanding the parking lot will cost $1.2 million, and be paid for by Gateway. The state's share was tucked into the incentives package.
Funny, I’ve looked at the Legislative Fiscal Bureau’s writeup of the Foxconn bill, and I don’t see anything that talks about giving $5 million to Gateway Tech (if I’m wrong, feel free to correct me).

There is language relating to having the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development use $20 million “to facilitate worker training and employment in the state.” But that doesn’t start until 2019, and a Kenosha News story indicates that Gateway Tech’s Board of Trustees are seeking a (separate?) state grant. So is that ANOTHER $5 mil on top of the $20 million in the next budget? And are the Foxconn employees working out of Gateway Tech going to have 17% of their paychecks written off by Foxconn, which means seeing costs would go out the door in THIS budget (which wasn’t in the plans)? Worth keeping an eye on.

Meanwhile, the state’s 3rd largest city doesn’t have enough money to fix its roads.
The Green Bay City Council on Tuesday approved Ald. John Vander Leest's proposal to draft a resolution that would ask the governor and legislators from northeastern Wisconsin for additional state aid.

“If you go out and campaign and run for office, you know what the first thing that people say? ‘Fix the damn roads,’” Vander Leest said in an interview. “It’s a major issue.”

Overall state general transportation aid to the city has decreased from $4.1 million in 2011 to $3.5 million this year, according to data from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation.
And if GB doesn’t get that extra money (and they likely won’t, given the mess that the Transportation Fund is in), then a new $20 wheel tax is on the table to help to pay for road repairs in Titletown. They would join the NE Wisconsin city of New London, which became the latest community to add such a fee in recent years, with the extra $20 taking effect on January 1.

And late this week we got word that a large Fox Valley employer may be shutting down and throwing hundreds of people in the 920 out of work.
The future is uncertain for more than 600 employees of Appleton Coated, a paper mill in Combined Locks. Employees were notified Wednesday they were being laid off as the company, in receivership, is up for sale.

Even with one buyer ready to close a deal, local and county leaders are working to prevent the sale in hopes of saving the mill.
Appleton Coated has been part of the Combined Locks community for more than a hundred years. Now in receivership, the mill went up for auction earlier this week. As part of the bidding process, more than 600 workers were abruptly told Wednesday they were being laid off immediately as no buyers wanted to purchase that liability.

"We're all temporarily laid off 'til the closing date, and then they'll have more information whether it's permanent and they shut the mill down or if they try to run, so..." says mill employee Nick Weyenberg.
We’ll find out next week if a judge in Outagamie County allows other organizations to bid on and possibly re-open the plant, but it’s interesting that the WBAY news story says Outagamie Co Exec Tom Nelson is trying to keep the jobs, while Walker and WEDC aren’t mentioned at all.

These three contrasting items lend an obvious question- why are these places in Northeastern Wisconsin going through such troubles to fix roads, balance their budgets and keep jobs while hundreds of millions of dollars a year are being funneled down to the SE corner of the state for Foxconn?

What’s funny is that UW’s Katherine Cramer says a key part of the GOP’s electoral success in Wisconsin in the 2010s is based out of people in outstate Wisconsin seeing their tax dollars go elsewhere and not get much of a return on their tax dollars. Maybe these rurals should focus that justifiable anger on the REAL re-distributionists – the WisGOP politicians that voted for Scott Walker budgets that neglected their local communities while approving of a Fox-con that sends billions to one corporation and one area of the state.

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Walker vetoes don't help much. Some take it from bad to worse

Here are a few things I caught from the Governor's 99 budget vetoes, which were released this afternoon.

1. True to what had been rumored as part of the agreement to get the budget out of the Senate, Walker used his veto pen to make for an immediate repeal of prevailing wage requirements on highway projects because Walker claims "I object to making the taxpayers of Wisconsin wait for nearly a year before the can begin to benefit from the cost savings" that result from screwing workers further. Because the real problem in this state is that workers are making too much (slams head on desk).

2. There is a common theme of "gimme what I said I wanted in this budget!" This includes Walker putting a $500,000 limit on awards for the Historic Rehab Tax Credit, despite huge usage throughout the state. It also includes Walker removing 5 positions from the State's Elections Commission (even though the Elections Commission indicated they needed the staff), and Walker getting rid of the Educational Approval Board, which oversees private colleges and universities in the state (a nice check from Betsy DeVos is sure to follow).

3. Walker's vetoes consistenttly remove oversight and reports that the Legislature tried to put upon him. The worst of these involves Walker's veto of a requirement put in by the Joint Finance Committee that required them to be notified of any transfers being made out of the Veterans Homes account to try to fill in budget holes in the Veterans Trust Fund. The Walker Administration has taken tens of millions of dollars out of the Homes in the last few years, and it has become all the more disturbing in light of the deteriorating conditions at King Veterans Home, including water that looked like this.



Walker vetoed the Legislature's desire to at leat OK the transfers before they happen, claiming
I object to the creation of a series of additional mandated reports which are administratively burdensome and redirects valuable staff time away from care for veterans. Further, I believe these requirements encroach on the executive branch's responsibility to manage state agency programs within the statutes and funding levels set by the Legislature.
Actually Scotty, you haven't been able to handle things "within statutes and funding levels," or else you wouldn't be raiding money that was intended to go to the Veterans' Homes to bail out your budget problems.

Walker also removed oversight in topics ranging from refusing to submit reports to illustrate the outcomes of his "pee in a cup" welfare "reforms" and the costs to continue those measures, and he refused to allow additional reports on costs and progress relating to the state's new STAR portal for human resources and finances, as well as information about whether Wisconsinites were being charged excessive fees compared to the cost of services.

4. There's also some pork projects that got stripped out with these vetoes. They include Legislature-added projects such as $1 million for unknown work in the basement of the Capitol, DOT projects enumerating work to expand I-94 in St. Croix County, and Highway 154 in Sauk County. But one other pork project did not get Walker's axe.


Hey, at least Scotty stays bought. You gotta give him that.

5. The worst of the vetoes involves Walker deciding not to give any relief to rural schools. The largest of this set of 3 vetoes is the removal of a provision that would districts limited by low tax bases to spend more money to get closer to parity to the rest of the state. Walker instead is choosing to rely on an election-year talking point of "lower property taxes" over actually helping these schools get by.
I am vetoing this section entirely because the result is a substantial increase in property tax capacity that school districts may exercise without voter input. In several school districts that would be eligible to raise taxes under these sections, referenda to exceed revenue limits already failed within the past two years. An increase in revenue authority from the state in these districts would circumvent purposeful, local actions.

It should also be noted that in some cases, the same districts that would have become eligible to increase their revenues with this adjustment have increased their base revenues at a rate higher than the state average. This brings into question the need for this adjustment and highlights the need for local taxpayer input before a revenue limit adjustment is made.

As a result of this veto, the low revenue adjustment level for school districts will remain at $9,100. School districts across the state will benefit from other significant education investments in this budget, including meaningful increases in per pupil aid. These per pupil increases are equal among all school districts. Additionally, school districts could pursue an increase in their revenue limit through a referendum as is the case under current law. In fact, numerous districts have already done so by asking taxpayers through a referendum. Increases to the low revenue adjustment can be discussed in future state budgets.
That won't help the small schools that are suffering today, and even Joint Finance Committee co-chair John Nygren was unhappy with Walker's veto.



In theory John, you could do something to deal with that. I think they call it an "override". Let's see if the GOP-run Legislature steps up to regain some control over this budget, or if they let Walker continue to enjoy a lack of accountability and continue to allow the schools in their districts to suffer.

Lots more to get to, but I got a Brewers game to wrap up and $1 Old Fashioneds tomorrow. Feel free to dig in and see what else you find.