Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Younger workers leaving Fitzwalkerstan make our demographics problem even worse

Dale Knapp of Forward Analytics produced a study for the Wisconsin Counties Association that reiterates Wisconsin’s demographic concerns, which are limiting our state’s ability to grow.

As the summary sheet for the study notes, Wisconsin used to benefit from younger people moving in, which allowed its workforce to expand in the 1990s and early 2000s. That reversed with the onset of the Great Recession, sped up in the Age of Fitzwalkerstan, and is now at the point that the state finds itself with more older workers than younger ones.
For example, in 1990, Wisconsin had 1.75 residents under 16 for each resident 50 to 64 years of age, and the state’s workforce expanded almost 17% over 15 years. By 2000, this ratio had fallen to 1.42 young people per resident near retirement, and the labor force expanded just 4.1% during 2000-15. At 0.87 in 2017, this long-term indicator is pointing to a shrinking labor pool over the next 15 years.
The analytics group gives an example of how this works in the full report, and why Wisconsin has such a problem today.
Before delving into the narrow age groups, it is helpful to take a broad look at the migration of those who were 15 to 59 years old in 2010, compared to those of similar ages in prior years. In 2010, Wisconsin had 3.49 million residents who were 15 to 59 years of age. Five years later, it had 3.41 million residents ages 20 to 64. In other words, the size of this critical workforce cohort declined by 78,571 people. There were approximately 47,618 deaths among this group. The remaining decline of 30,953 people was a net out-migration of residents (see Figure 3).

This decline is similar to 2005-2010, but is a major shift from 20 years earlier. During 1990-1995, a similarly-aged cohort grew by 91,850 due to net in-migration from other states or countries. During 2000-2005, the state also added to this group, though the number was less than 17,000.

Wisconsin has generally lost people in the post-college graduate ages of 25-29, but in the recent past, they would have a sizable group of people move back to the state in their 30s and 40s, often due to advantages Wisconsin had over other places such as a lower cost of living and higher quality of life (yours truly included).

That’s not happening so much anymore, especially among people that were aged 25-34 at the start of a 5-year period. In addition, more Gen Xers are moving out than moving in.
Over the most recent five years studied, Wisconsin experienced a net in-migration of fewer than 3,000 among this (25-34) group.

A similar downward trend has occurred with those 35 to 49 years of age, many of whom are also working and raising families. Significant in-migration in the early 1990s turned to fewer gains during both 2000-2005 and 2005-2010 (see Figure 8).

However, while Wisconsin continued to add to the 25 to 34 year old cohort during 2010-2015, it lost to other states or countries more than 12,000 of those who were 35 to 49 years of age in 2010.


Even worse, while Wisconsin gained between 42,600 and more than 69,000 children in each 5 year period between 1990 and 2010, that number plummeted to less than 10,000 between 2010 and 2015. I’m sure the fact that this change happened after Act 10 and other efforts to eradicate public education in Wisconsin were put in place is pure coincidence (the lousy economy for young people also didn’t help).

What the Forward Analytics study shows is that unless Wisconsin changes its path and starts getting younger workers to want to come here, this state will be stagnant at best because of these demographic problems. And when people under 40 saw this on Election Night 2016, it didn’t help.


It’s time to Make Wisconsin Great Again – by investing in education and other types of quality of life, paying good wages for good jobs, instead of the lowest manufacturing wages in the Midwest. And returning to our pre-Walker tradition of clean government and not tolerating idiotic, destructive politicians.

Some of this restoration started with the election of Tony Evers and statewide slate of Dems last November, but with the gerrymandered Legislature determined to keep Wisconsin in a Koched-up direction, and an anti-Wisconsin Tax Scam in place from DC, there may only be so much that can be done before 2020. So many areas of the state are likely to continue to shed sizable amounts of working-age people in the next 2 years, as shown by the dark purple in this map.


But with the new decade of the 2020s comes a new opportunity, and much of it will be related to whether Wisconsin can erase the red stain that has marked it for much of the 2010s. It’s a stain that a lot of people are choosing not to be a part of, especially outside of progressive areas of the state and especially with younger workers. Turning the state back to progressive blue wouldn’t just help the frame of mind of people that live in the few areas that are growing, but also for the many parts of the state that have been dying in the Age of Fitzwalkerstan and now can’t find anyone to work what few decent jobs that are left.

14 comments:

  1. Awww Jake, there's plenty of decent jobs left... But many of us with hiring authority use the online 'Walker Recall List' like a 'Corporate Blacklist!' It's been immensely helpful in hiring quality people and avoiding whiny, complaining (and often drug-addicted and thus absent) mediocre Lefties, let me tell you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, you don't even have a real job, kiddo, let alone one that would hire. And how pathetic that you have to portray yourself as being more important than who you are.

      But thanks for admitting that driving away talent and decency is a GOP strategy. It's certainly true that most dying areas in the state are getting redder, while the few growing areas like Madison and Eau Claire are getting bluer.

      Delete
  2. Short term the "thinkers" like washcorepub say wise ass things now, but very soon there will be more baby boom retirees than kids 18 and unde, which means that future workers won't be paying in enough for taxes to support SS and Medicare. That's why immigration is so important to maintain robust labor force.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Immigration is not the solution.

      Delete
  3. WashCoRepub is being brutally honest about how divided Walker's Wisconsin continues to be 10 years after Act 10 & the Walker recall election. There are MANY Republican owned companies that use the Verify the Recall website as their 1st screening tool on who they will hire. Problem for Walker's Wisconsin is that the effects of this GOP discrimination go far beyond the 1 million Wisconsinites that are "blacklisted" by the WISGOP. Many young people won't even consider employment in Wisconsin b/c of the GOP Blacklists and the deep division & hatred in Walker's Wisconsin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And those limited dimwits were the ones who WISGOP listens to when it comes to economic policy. You wonder why we've got 7+ years of subpar job growth and are bleeding young talent? YEESH!

      Time for those guys to take a seat in the back for a long while whike those of us with a clue about economics and a speck of decency Make Wisconsin Great Again.

      Delete
    2. Jake, you forgot to point out that the comments
      of WashCoRepub and Anonymous prove that the whole idea of a "labor shortage," "talent shortage," or "worker shortage" is nothing but a vicious lie. If there were really a worker shortage, companies would be raising wages, and they definitely wouldn't be blacklisting a quarter of the entire state based on political views. Not to mention the rampant age discrimination against people over 50. I guess if you don't want to hire Democrats, you don't want to hire people who are over 50, but you also hate Millennials, (which basically leaves Republicans between the ages of 37 and 50) then you might actually think that there's a labor shortage. Here in the real world, there's still plenty of discouraged workers and folks trapped in the "gig economy" who would love to get back into a stable job if it paid a decent wage.

      There's no shortage of people who are ready, willing, and able to work, just a shortage of experienced people who are willing to accept less than a fair wage, because God forbid private sector companies would have to train people or pay them what they're worth.

      Delete
  4. People aged 18 and up in 2010 who signed are black listed. I saw this happen as a state employee. Anyone under 18 in 2010 won't be on the list. The oldest of those are now 28. If I understand Figure 3 correctly, we are losing more people (30k), none of whom signed the recall because they couldn't. Is that correct?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Figure 3 includes all people 15-59, so it's pretty much anyone of working age, and many likely did sign the recall.

      There is another stat that says Wisconsin lost over 30,000 people aged 20-24 in Wisconsin in 2010. Many of those people were likely in college/tech school during Act 10, and they got out of town soon after. Traditionally they have returned to Wisconsin in their late 20s-30s, but as Figure 7 shows, that's not happening either.

      Delete
  5. Figure 6 in the report corroborates my previous comment better. What Washpo said simply isn't correct. There is no way of knowing the political leanings of workers under 28.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Though I am a lifelong Democrat, I have many friends and business contacts who are staunch right wing Republicans and who own small manufacturing or machine tool companies. Most if not all admit to Blacklisting anyone who signed a Walker recall petition from employment at their companies. Though they all gripe about not having enough "qualified" applicants, the ONLY job applicants they will even consider are those that they are able to identify as Republicans.

    Finding ANY evidence of Democratic political identification guarantees that the applicant will not get hired at most Republican owned businesses, especially in the reddest areas of Walker's Wisconsin. So the original BlackList continues to expand to include anyone who might vote Democratic in right wing Walker's Wisconsin.

    Young people of all political persuasions don't want to settle in a state that is as divided as Walker's Wisconsin. I say, good for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't believe this is still happening. And how do these guys (and I bet they're all guys) figure out who "seems like a Democrat"? Facebook stalking? The ability to talk in complete sentences?

      And we're supposed to keep giving these jerks the M&A tax cut? We already know it hasn't helped add jobs or wages in these fields, but if these mediocre yokels are blacklisting qualified people, they should have it yanked for that alone.

      Delete
  7. I would guess employers also search the Democracy Campaign's database to see who gave to who.

    ReplyDelete
  8. My signature on the Walker Recall Petition is framed and hangs on the wall in our dining room. My friends and family recognize it as proof of civic engagement, proof of my demand for accountable, transparent, responsive governance, and evidence of my open defiance of Republican corruption and the one-percent freaks and Fascists who prop up Republican idiot-puppet legislators.
    WashCoRepub admits to discriminatory hiring practices. Gotta wonder what other illegal activities he believes he's entitled to commit. Audit time. But IOKIYAR...
    Imagine this clown in the hospital. He's about to be operated on, and he's asking the anesthesiologist about her political affiliation, and wants to know who his surgeon voted for.
    Promotion and advancement in my shop are a function of merit, experience and the ability to collaborate. Political affiliation? Never comes up. Not important. Never mentioned. Never discussed.

    ReplyDelete