Tuesday, November 6, 2018

And now, enjoy this set of pre-election bar charts

This is more of a visualization than what I was talking about yesterday. I am using the statewide results in Wisconsin for President in 2012 (Obama by 6.8%), 2014 Governor (Walker by 5.7%) and 2016 President (Trump +0.7%). These seem like good guides to compare tonight's result with as they come in. (All of these charts will use how Dems did vs GOPs as a baseline, so +5 means Dems won by 5, and -5 means the GOP won by 5).

First of all, let's go to the Milwaukee metro area. What's remarkable about 2016 is that Hillary Clinton did better than Barack Obama in all of these counties, with Democrats improving by anywhere from 10-22 points in Milwaukee County and the 3 pro-GOP WOW Counties.

The question here is twofold. 1. Turnout, as the City of Milwaukee undervoted in 2016, which was a big reason Hillary Clinton lost by 22,000 votes statewide. 2. Will the trend away from Trump in 2016 continue, or will Walker continue to clean up in this area. If Evers is even within 30-35 points in these counties, that's a notable improvement from Burke in 2014.
Now let's look a little further north from the Milwaukee metro area. 

Northeastern Wisconsin has been key to Scott Walker's success, and also Donald Trump's in 2016. By comparison, Obama basically played Romney to near-even in this area outside of Fond du Lac, and won in Winnebago County (Oshkosh). 

Now we head down Highway 29 and I-94, and see a couple of high-voting counties in the north central and northwest part of the state. 



Marathon County has slanted hard to the right since 2012, but Trump also did several points better than Romney in 2016. If Evers is performing around Obama 2012 levels in these counties, it not only likely means he wins, but also may lead to good things for some swingy and flippable seats in the Legislature for Dems. 

And the biggest indicator of a good night for Dems downticket may come from this next chart. 


This is largely La Crosse and the Driftless area of the state, which is traditionally Dem in national races, and even went against Walker in 2014, but slanted hard to Trump in 2016. Turnout patterns indicated more Dem votes in both the Supreme Court election and the primaries in 2018, and if that area stays blue tonight, it likely means solid Dem wins downticket in a few open Assembly seats and the big-money Senate race between Kriss Marion and Howard Marklein. 

Lastly, let's go into South Central Wisconsin, where Dems often win, but a lot of voters slipped away from the Dems outside of Dane County in 2016. 

For Evers to win, he needs to get near a combination of Obama 2012 in the counties outside of Dane County, and a Clinton 2016 number in the Mad City. Given reports of near-presidential year turnout in Madtown, this could give Evers a big vote lead that would be hard for Walker to make back in a neutral year. 

 Well, less than 3 hours to go. Now we wait. 

Monday, November 5, 2018

A few random things to look for tomorrow

I had a long bunch of numbers ready to go for tomorrow's statewide races, but then I forgot to save the spreadsheets and instead I'll just go with the "small and simple" version.

First of all, let's flash back to August's primary, and look at the breakdown of "Dem vs GOP" votes with a map from the incomparable J. Miles Coleman of Decision Desk HQ (and if you're not following Coleman tomorrow, you need to do so).



Notice the preponderance of Dem votes in the southwestern part of the state. Given that many of the most flippable State Senate and Assembly races for Democrats are in the Driftless Area that Coleman describes, as well as other areas around Eau Claire, that region seems to loom large tomorrow. It also explains why I've seen many Dem Assembly members doing their "door-knocking" selfies in that area of Wisconsin.

The August map was similar to the pattern we saw with Rebecca Dallet's blowout of Michael Screnock in April's Supreme Court election, except that Dallet also did very well in northeastern and north central Wisconsin.



I'd anticipate the Dallet map to be similar to what we see tomorrow with the Vukmir-Baldwin Senate race, if Baldwin is to win by 10 points (as polls have indicated). Perhaps it'll be a bit lighter blue or pink around Green Bay and Appleton, and there might be a few other differences due to turnout patterns, but you get the idea.

The other maps showing the shifts are also worth keeping in mind, because a big question to be answered comes from the oddities of the 2016 election. The area of the state where Hillary Clinton really lost the state was in Northern and Western Wisconsin, where she lost areas that Barack Obama and even Mary Burke had won, and lost them by a lot. That was summed up well by this meme'd tweet after the April elections.



Looking back to Walker's last statewide campaign in 2014, two big things played into his 5.7% victory, as this map indicates.


1. He destroyed Mary Burke in the WOW Counties, getting over 70% in every each of those counties, won Washington County by a whopping 53 points, and gained over 92,000 votes in Waukesha County alone.

2. Walker rolled in the 920 area code - winning often-blue Winnebago County (Oshkosh) by 11%, Brown County (GB) by 17%, Outagamie County (Appleton) by 20%, Manitowoc County by 25%, Sheboygan County by 28%, and Fond du Lac County by 29%.

Evers has to improve from Burke's numbers in those places. And recent elections indicate that improvement is possible. Among many weird things in the 2016 election in this state was the fact that Donald Trump actually did significantly worse than Walker did in 2014 in those places. Trump's margin of victory was 12 points less than Walker's in Washington County, 19 points less in Waukesha County, and 22 points in Ozaukee County.

The question is whether the move away from the GOP was a one-time thing due to Charlie Sykes and company telling their sheep not to support Trump, or if it's a more permanent shift by better-educated suburbanites that are done with the anti-education and often-thuggish GOP. If Evers can split the difference between 2014 and 2016 in the WOW Counties, he likely wins tomorrow.

And the votes in 2018 also show that Northeastern Wisconsin has been more amenable to Dem/liberal candidates, which culminated in Caleb Frostman winning an open Senate seat in the farthest corner of the state. Frostman is running for a full term this Fall, and the Appleton-area showdown between Roger Roth and Lee Snodgrass will also likely go a long way toward determining which party controls the Senate after Tuesday. The Congressional race between Dan Kohl and Glenn Grothman has also been hotly contested, which at least means there has been a Dem presence where one usually has not existed in that part of the state. If Evers can stay within 10 points in that 920 area code, it will be near-impossible for Walker to win statewide.

Lastly, I want to see if it's possible for Evers and Baldwin to run up even more of a lead in Milwaukee and Dane Counties. Hillary Clinton won Milwaukee County by 10 points more than Burke did in 2014, and won Dane County by 7% more than Burke. Remarkably, the 2018 elections have shown an even HIGHER advantage for Dems in those two population centers. 72.6% of Milwaukee County voters chose Dems in the August primary, and a whopping 84% of the August primary vote in Dane County was for Dems. Both are several points higher than Clinton's already-large share from 2016.

Combine that with big early vote numbers from the City of Milwaukee and twice as many early votes in Dane County vs 4 years ago, and if the Election Day vote comes through, Evers already will have a notable advantage.

Obviously, there's a lot that can be unknown, and I still have fears that not enough polls have taken the Guv's election out of the rigging zone. But if things are on the up-and-up tomorrow, this will be some of the things I will be looking for as the votes come in tomorrow night.

Please choose wisely, Wisconsin. Just once.

Great October jobs report and even wage growth! But the road ahead doesn't seem smooth

Given that I was busy and on the road some of last weekend, I never got to talk about the US jobs report from last Friday.

Not only did the United States continue at a near 50-year low at 3.7% unemployment for October, we got was a strong report on payrolls across the board.
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 250,000 in October, following an average monthly gain of 211,000 over the prior 12 months. In October, job growth occurred in health care, in manufacturing, in construction, and in transportation and warehousing. (See table B-1.)

Health care added 36,000 jobs in October. Within the industry, employment growth occurred in hospitals (+13,000) and in nursing and residential care facilities (+8,000). Employment in ambulatory health care services continued to trend up (+14,000). Over the past 12 months, health care employment grew by 323,000.

In October, employment in manufacturing increased by 32,000. Most of the increase occurred in durable goods manufacturing, with a gain in transportation equipment (+10,000). Manufacturing has added 296,000 jobs over the year, largely in durable goods industries.
Construction employment rose by 30,000 in October, with nearly half of the gain occurring among residential specialty trade contractors (+14,000). Over the year, construction has added 330,000 jobs.
I find the manufacturing and construction growth odd, because other recent reports have showed manufacturing growth slowing in October and new housing starts falling. That makes me wonder how long the job growth lasts, but for the time being, these businesses are still apparently hiring up.

And the item that likely got the biggest attention in the jobs report was this one.
In October, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 5 cents to $27.30. Over the year, average hourly earnings have increased by 83 cents, or 3.1 percent. Average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees increased by 7 cents to $22.89 in October.
We finally broke 3% for average hourly wages! Sadly, this is the first time since 2009 this has happened, but with gas and food prices dropping recently, it seems likely that this will lead to a very good number in real wage gains when inflation figures come out next week.

There are still some notable lags in that wage number, especially in one industry Trump was supposed to specifically improve – manufacturing.

12-month change, manufacturing wages
All manufacturing +1.46%
Durable goods manuf. +1.79%
Non-durable goods manuf +0.65%

But I admit, that is picking nits on a pretty good US jobs report. The revisions for prior months netted to 0 (up in August, down in September), so we also were 250,000 jobs ahead of where we thought we were last month. Those revisions also reiterate that Wisconsin continues to lag this growth, and it's worth remembering before tomorrow’s election that the final Walker jobs gap will be just under 150,000 jobs for these last 8 years, with that gap growing again in 2018.



No question, for the country at large it is still a strong economy at (or maybe above) full employment. But “the greatest economy in the history of our country?”, Mr. President? Cool it, Donny. It’s not even the best economy of this Gen Xer’s adult lifetime.

On the important metrics of how many people are working and increases in wages, today is well short of what the economy was doing 20 years ago, as well as in the Bubblicious times right before the last 2 recessions hit.

Employment-Population Ratio, 12-month wage change, and unemployment rates
Oct 2018 60.6% EPR, +3.1% wages, 3.7% UE
Jun 2007 63.0% EPR, +3.6% wages, 4.6% UE
Oct 2000 64.2% EPR, +3.8% wages, 3.9% UE
Oct 1998 64.1% EPR, +3.7% wages, 4.5% UE

In summary- the US economy continues to maintain its growth from the Obama years, and that should be acknowledged for the first 2 years of Trump/GOP in power, given that we would be expecting the 9+-year economic expansion to be ending by this point. But the “success” of low unemployment that Trump is pointing to is as much due to Boomers aging out of the workforce and not being replaced, as it is any kind of policy.

In addition, 1998, 2000, and even 2007 weren’t dealing with trillion dollar budget deficits like we are today, which allowed for more room to spend money to stabilize the economy once the inevitable recession hit. And it also seems clear that the GOP Tax Scam has blown a deficit-fueled Bubble into an already maxed-out economy that is likely to burst in the very near future. That deficit (and the increased borrowing that is required for it) has already played a major part in interest rates rising over the last few months (the 10-year note is back to the 3.2% range), and will likely make the next recession and attempts to recover from that bursting Bubble rougher than it would have been. Or should have been.

Lastly, if you think the strong October jobs report gives a big boost to the GOP's chances for tomorrow's midterms, let me go over some recent October job reports before a midterm.

Oct 2018 +250,000, +2.52 mil last 12 months
Oct 2014 +255,000, +2.76 mil last 12 months
Oct 2010 +267,000, +110,000 last 12 months (first growth in 2 1/2 years)
Oct 2006 +12,000, +2.21 mil last 12 months

The president's party lost at least 1 house of Congress in each of those previous 3 midterms. Just saying. t s

The voting numbers we know so far

Just a couple of numbers to keep in mind this morning.



And combine it with this.



And give a side order of this.



And people with college degrees are generally more likely to move around out of state, and keep area codes on their phones that aren't from the state they live in.

Yes, early votes can cannibalize votes on Election Day (I made that mistake of conflating the two in 2016), but this feels different, like a legitimate show of disgust and anger.

I hope to get more inti the turnout numbers tonight, but the more I look at these demos, the further off the last Bradley Foundation Marquette Poll looks to me, by undercounting younger voters.

I just hope the "error" was unintentional, and not a green light for Walker abd WISGOP to try to steal it.

Sunday, November 4, 2018

And now, Scott Walker's closing argument.


Sorry Scotty. It IS your fault this state has fallen behind the rest of the nation and has become a cesspool of corruption and cronyism. And it ends now.

At least Jake and Elwood Blues were committing crimes to help people in need. More than I can say for our Grifter Guv.

I can't believe I ever hurt you
I swear, I will never lie to you again.
Please, give me one more chance...


Friday, November 2, 2018

Walker lies about ACA plans and smears Obama. Because he is LOSING

I figured earlier this week that the Governor's race really wasn't tied 47-47, like Charles Franklin at Marquette Law School was claiming. And I got confirmation of that on Thursday, when I saw this tweet.



COME THE F ON! All Scott Walker has had to do for the last several months is to tell Brad Schimel to drop out of the lawsuit trying to abolish the ACA, call a special session, and push for that bill to be passed. He has not done that, because he has no intention of doing that.

The only reason Walker is throwing this out there is BECAUSE HE IS LOSING, and in particular, losing on the health care issue because people know he has actively worked to sabotage the ACA in Wisconsin from the moment he took office nearly 8 years ago.

Even more amazing is the two-step Scotty tries to pull, if you dig into the article that Marley wrote on this.
"We can protect people with pre-existing conditions without protecting the failure, the failure that is Obamacare," he said. He lauded a $200 million program to lower premiums for individuals who get coverage through the Obamacare marketplaces. The lower costs will start in January.
The coverage of pre-existing conditions IS BECAUSE OBAMACARE MAKES INSURERS DO IT. And that reinsurance plan was ALLOWED UNDER OBAMACARE, and it is an example of government subsidizing insurers so that they won't lower premiums. Other than who gets the money, how is that different than the ACA giving tax credits to people who buy health care on the individual market?

In fact, if there's a "failure of the ACA, it's because it trusted insurance companies and private organizations to offer services at a reasonable price, and in some instances, that didn't happen. Likely because there was no strong regulation over premium prices or a public option to compete alongside of these profit-driven insurance companies. However, Walker cynically ignored that fact to smear the president who signed the Affordable Care Act into law.
He criticized former President Barack Obama, who during a speech last week in Milwaukee charged Walker and other Republicans were lying about their record on health care.

He recalled that in 2013 Politifact gave it's "Lie of the Year" to Obama for saying, "If you like your health care, you can keep it."

"That was the lie of the year," Walker said. "So, I guess if you're going to lie about health care and pre-existing conditions you might as well bring in the biggest liar in the world."
Uhh, the overwhelming majority of us did keep our health care, and at similar if not lower prices. As did you, as a public employee. And the fact that lifetime grifter Scott "It's Not My Fault" Walker is questioning anyone else's honesty is beyond rich.

It also shows Walker's willful ignorance of how health care actually works in the real world, as was illustrated in a recent column from UW professors William Holahan and Charles Kroncke titled "Why won't free market insure those with pre-existing conditions?"
Is there a simple way, without rancorous partisan rhetoric, to explain to voters why the Republican "free-market solutions" will not work? Fortunately, there is. Unregulated health insurance firms (i.e., health insurers operating in a “free market") charge "experience-rated" premiums; just as high-risk drivers pay more for their car insurance, those with pre-existing health conditions pay more for their health insurance policies.

Experience rating is the natural result of market forces. The competitive market gives the insurer no choice. If an insurer decided to charge all policyholders a "community rate," (i.e., a common rate that is less than the average cost of covering high-risk policyholders but more than the average cost of low-risk policyholders), competing firms would then find it profitable to offer a rate lower than the community rate in order to lure the less-risky people away from the firm that charged the community rate. If society demands affordable premiums for those with pre-existing conditions, it can only come about through regulation, not unregulated "free markets."...

Vice President Mike Pence was in Wisconsin recently to stump for Gov. Walker's re-election and to tout a patient-centered alternative that allows insurance companies to sell lower-cost, short-term policies that are not guaranteed renewable, have no requirement for an essential-benefits package, and although he claimed otherwise, have no requirement to cover those with pre-existing conditions.

One does not have to be hyperpartisan to recognize that these "free market solutions" won't work. Those who understand how markets work know that they cannot provide universal health insurance unless guided by regulation to do so. An unregulated insurance market will treat sick people with pre-existing conditions with the same disdain as they do drunk drivers. Markets do not have empathy; humans must supply that — for the market should serve the people, not vice versa.
But that's not what Scott Walker or other GOP hacks want to admit. And they don't want to mention how their crocodile tears over covering pre-existing conditions 1. Prove that there are a lot of good things in the ACA that are an improvement over what we had; and 2. Won't be affordable for the typical person that needs treatment for that pre-existing condition, because GOPs won't do anything to limit premiums for their insurance company donors, meaning that people either go broke, or they go without insurance and die.

Then again, Scott Walker hasn't had to deal with getting his own health care since he was 25 years old, because he and his family has been covered by the State of Wisconsin and/or Milwaukee County. Sounds like it's time for Scotty and the Walkers to find out what it's like out there in the real world, and see if he talks so tough when he has to get a real job and search for insurance like so many others do.

Thursday, November 1, 2018

Kicking it in a dead mall

I'm back in Indianapolis for the weekend to support my wife and others this weekend. And given where I'm staying is connected to the Circle Center Mall downtown, I wanted to scope the area tonight.

Back in the early 2000s, this joint would have been jumping on the top floor, with bars and clubs going (I remember Thursdays being cheap beer and '80s tunes).

Not so much today. The 4th floor is mostly closed, and the other floors weren't much better at 9pm local time on a Thursday night



It's odd on how something that was considered cutting edge and a big part of the development of downtown Indy 20 years ago is now an outdated relic. Granted, I'm sure there is more action during the day and the street level restaurants look good and modern, but it's still a little jarring.

I should have more time to talk about more serious stuff tomorrow, but figured I'd give you those pics and looks tonight.

EDIT- Here's their Capitol from a distance. Not bad, but definitely not as cool as ours. Both are in desperate need of cleaning up, thoudiv