It's a bit of a catch-all and has become a cultural clash point, but if you just sum it up to that, you're missing the bigger picture. "Ok Boomer" isn't a complaint about social issues as much as it is an economic one. Because it is indisputable that
Boomers have had it better than the generations that have followed. And that's not just the case in 2019, but also when Boomers were as young as millennials are today, and when I was in my mid-30s right before the Great Recession hit.
Take a look at this chart from a recent article from Nicole Lyn Pesce in CBS Marketwatch.
But Marketwatch tells us under 50 not to worry, because this wealth gap could shorten the old-fashioned way.Gen Xers lagged far behind Baby Boomers in the percentage of U.S. household wealth held at similar ages. Millennials lag even further behind.
— Gray 'serial millennial myth debunker' Kimbrough (@graykimbrough) November 24, 2019
Boomers continue to hold steady at over 56% of U.S. household wealth. pic.twitter.com/4ICYseGAYZ
As a whole, boomers have fared better financially than Gen Xers (born between 1965 and 1980) and millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) throughout every stage of their lives. Boomers currently boast more than half (57%) of the nation’s wealth, while Gen X owns just 16%, and millennials 3%.
Adults under 40 have been accumulating less and less wealth over the past 30 years, plummeting from owning 13% of the wealth in 1989 to less than 7% today.
Indeed, at a median age of 35, Gen Xers owned just 9% of the nation’s wealth in 2008 — less than half what boomers had at that age. And millennials will have to triple their net worth in the next four years to catch up to Generation X at 35, and increase their wealth sevenfold to catch up to boomers at that age.
Boomers are expecting to pass on their estates to their heirs in what’s being dubbed “the great wealth transfer,” which could see those millennials lucky enough to have relatives with money collecting $59 trillion in wealth and assets.So just wait for your parents and grandparents to keel over, and things will be just fine, you young’uns! Even if you might not have Social Security to back up that wealth as you get older (headdesk).
Let’s go back to this Saturday Night Live skit from January. It seems even more relevant today as the stock market jumps on trade rumors and irrational exuberance to buffer the Boomers’ portfolios, while the rest of us tread water because we still have bills to pay, and those bills keep going up.
Host: "Carrie, it's your lucky day. That means you get to play for the Boomer Birthright Bonanza...That's a full-time job, a starter home, no student debt, and we'll throw in the Social Security. In other words, you get everything the Boomers got, just for being born at the right time."
That skit is basically a live-person version of the “Old Economy Steven” memes that started getting popular around a decade ago, with the last scene nearly taking this specific meme word-for-word.
And while Boomers have many of their health insurance concerns taken care of with Medicare, many of the rest of us get our pockets picked with no cost controls, and little year-to-year certainty for both health insurance and housing costs.
These items underscore a real tension in the country these days. Some people, especially those who are older and financially comfortable, think that the country is overall doing OK, and while a few of its leaders are messed up, if they’re replaced or diminished, things will be peachy. Other people, especially those younger and financially vulnerable, see a society where getting ahead is a lot harder than it used to be, a lot of people are ignored and/or punished by those in charge, and that our economic and governance structures need to be significantly changed.
What wins out will go a long way toward determining what the 2020s will hold in this country. Will it continue to be our current, corporatist landscape with major divisions and differences between haves, have somes, and have nots? Or will it be a society that actually allows people under 50 a chance to get out of debt, not be one bad event away from financial disaster, raise families comfortably, and see a future worth investing in?
Ok Boomer? You gonna continue to make the rest of us play this losing game? And if the Boomers won’t vote and work to get the changes that need to be made, are we going to keep accepting that?
Trump cultists can't see this tragic outcome rolling in. When I saw this story my heart sank.
ReplyDeleteBoomers have allowed, through excessive self-absorption, the growth of economic and social divides that now exacerbate generational divides.
ReplyDeleteAs they age and their imagined "paying of dues" allows them the conceit that they can rest on their laurels and become takers, and also stand at the sidelines while their own children are disenfranchised by a rigged economy, small wonder that boomers are viewed as part of the problem.
Never been a fan of stereotypes. I am a boomer. My daughters are millennials. I fully understand the benefits my generation has had and I spend time and money to ensure my children and my some day grandchildren will be able to enjoy the economic benefits I have. Might help if more millennials voted. We need each other.
ReplyDeleteI know there are plenty of good Boomers who get it, and/or have been screwed over themselves. But it's also undeniable that there are generational differences in voting patterns and approaches to solving this country's many problems, and I do think that some of it is related to one generation living in a very different set of circumstances vs the other.
DeleteYes, we need each other. But a lot of voters don't seem to understand that these days, and are voting based on their own selfish needs, and/or want to protect what they've been fortunate enough to have. This includes white, male privilege, by the way, which is where the epithet of "OK Boomer" is overwhelmingly targeted at.
Another important thing to understand about today's American economy that few out there comprehend is that companies can much more easily outsource any position they can't find an American worker to underpay. America's own companies are notorious about outsourcing anything and everything they can.
ReplyDeleteT
One of the most unfortunate things I've seen is US companies that get purchased by foreign companies and they actually offer more pay and benefits than the US company did to match their overseas pay and benefits.
I would even be tempted to say that the US is ultimately turning into a primarily retirement country as the median age continues to rise and the older generations prioritize what is important to them and they aren't interested or simply don't care what life is or will be like for future generations and their generation is large and powerful. I know a lot of people in that age group and it seems like some of them wish the youngerand poorer generations would just move elsewhere because they aren't interested in paying for or supporting others and feel the US should just convert to a retirement playground for the rich and elite and outsource as much as possible including military,NASA, manufacturing, business services, education, technology and other worldwide functions to allied countries instead of being located here. In that case, the only people that would be allowed to enter the US would be millionaires and above so that the wealthy wouldn't need to foot the bill for healthcare or assistance in the way of food stamps.
Keep in mind I'm not personally suggesting this option but maybe what we are actually experiencing overall in the US is a move towards a "wealthy only" country and those people who have less than so much income and/or pay rate will no longer feel welcome or wanted here and would financially be forced to leave the US either for living wages, to get ahead or simply survive.
I realize to some out of touch people out there, that this sounds extreme or outright crazy, but from what I've been seeing, this appears to be exactly what's been happening. Falling wages, benefits and time off (in some cases far lower when combined than most other developed countries), sky high housing costs, utilities and taxes, lack of investment in worker training (recent article states the US used to spend 25 billion on it in the 1970s, and now, we spend 5 billion), Out of control education costs, medical costs far more expensive than other countries with worse outcomes...and nearly everyone at the political level nationally is a multi millionaire or billionaire that normally votes against the less fortunate and small companies and organizations.
So all I'm saying here is simply that the days of America being for everyone might simply be in the past and I'm not even sure it will change because most of the Boomer generation never faced this situation and it might even be better for them to keep it this way because it keeps their taxes down. Conservatives do very well in elections with older populations. The situation is also causing high death rates among younger and working age people, so it could be decades before this situation changes. The problem for the poor is that they simply won't be able to hang on long enough to survive because the situation may actually continue to worsen for quite a while before anything changes. Politicians may even try to purposely make it worse to force the poor out. The biggest challenge for the poor is what other country will even be willing to accept them as most countries view the poor as liabilities instead of opportunities. We need to all be looking at the big picture and realize these issues are high level issues that require national changes to fix and until more people start taking them seriously, it's not going to improve.